Vindicated! Intranet Best Bets part deux

posted July 4th, 2008 by Neil Richards

Two days ago I wrote about CMS watch missing a trick on best bets. This evening (blogging on a Friday evening is very very sad), I found an article from Toby Ward of the Intranet Blog which describes my thinking more clearly. In it Toby discusses some of the most beautiful intranets an “jumpwords”

One intranet manager, Kurt (I’ll not divulge his full name nor his organization for the sake of fulfilling his confidentially obligations to his organization) informed me that one of the most popular features on his company’s intranet (a financial services organization of more than 10,000 employees) is a ‘jumpword’ application. A jumpword tool is attached to the search engine and allows people to seek out the best results which are manually coded to a specific keyword search.

One of the areas we have issues on is our navigation and providing more service to the employee on our intranet,” says Kurt. “The jumpword application allows people to enter something like “performance” and it takes them to the performance management site, which is highly popular. It’s a good tool but has festered into over 2000 jumpwords which is a heavy indication that the navigation is not helping people get what they need.

The jumpwords application is written in .NET with a backend SQL database. Employees fill out a request form (attached to the online application) requesting their jumpword and the URL they want it directed to. When a user types in the jumpword it does a lookup of the jumpword file and has logic that redirects them to the site associated URL. If there is no jumpword it brings them to the front search page.

The execution isn’t exactly as I would do it, but close enough for you to get the point. I might even do a mockup at some stage so you could see how it might work.

Intranet “best bets” a bad idea?

posted July 2nd, 2008 by Neil Richards

Column Two just linked to a post by the guys at CMS watch discussing “search best bets” which is accurate, but not necessarily relevant for law firms.

For those not familiar with the term, a “best bet” is a recommendation manually added to a search engine. For a very basic example, imagine you typed “senior partner” into your firm’s search engine, a manually created entry would return at the top of the list with a link to a page about your firm’s senior partner instead of having it lost amongst the firmwide communications from or intranet pages where the term “senior partner” can be found.

The premise of the CMS Watch blog is twofold. First, your search engine should be able to give you the relevant result automatically (and if it doesn’t you should consider a new search vendor).

Um, slightly impractical. YOU can try telling your IT Director that.

Second, CMS Watch worries about having thousands of best-bet links. If you’re clever, it need not get that bad, and even several thousand are manageable if you distribute ownership.

Consider the following scenario:

A law firm will typically have a number of must-find terms (like “senior partner”) which should show up. There’s probably 100 terms that are relevant globally (e.g. benefits, executive committee, leave) and maybe another 100 for each office (e.g. taxi, holidays, address, emergency).

The number of these terms is not very high. It might take a day or so to gather the content and input them into the system, especially if you delegate “best bet” ownership to an individual per office.

In terms of maintenance, a biannual process to review and update the entries can be conducted in even less time by the “best bet” owners.

The benefit? Staff in an office can find what they need much more easily. If your search engine can’t deliver office-specific results, writing your own best bets tool is pretty simple.

These sort of brute-force solutions are often discounted by IT professionals. Concerns tend to be based upon possible explosive growth which might someday cause grief for IT, without considering the benefit of helping staff today.

That mentality might be nice were firms quick to execute complex projects (not limited to IT). However, that’s not been my experience. The trade-off of possible increased maintenance for IT versus helping a lawyer book a taxi late at night is one I’d make any day of the week.

How’s your web presence?

posted June 24th, 2008 by Neil Richards

Ron Friedman has an insightful little post on Managing the Brand Called You. In it, talks about the “Mom yardstick”. If his mother can be found on google, why can’t you?

He also talks about society having reached the tipping point where the lack of a web presence “suggests a lack of involvement”.

Ron’s bang on. In addition to managing your network (something many professionals are poor at) you’ll now have to manage your online brand, and not just by being on Facebook or MySpace.

One piece of guidance that might be helpful is to consider what your Risk/Compliance department might you about email:

“Imagine any email you write ends up in the hands of the press”

Now, when considering your personal brand that advice might turn into:

“Imagine anything you write on the Internet ends up in the hands of a client or recruiter”

It’s time to be a little more strategic about how we use our web browsers.

Firefox3 download link for those in the UK

posted June 17th, 2008 by Neil Richards

If you just can’t wait, http://www.mozilla-europe.org/en/firefox/ seems to be loading (mozilla.org’s timing out due to the release of Firefox 3).

Headshift launches Casefiles wiki

posted June 13th, 2008 by Neil Richards

The good folks over at Headshift have launched a new site which hosts a collection of case studies and use cases for Enterprise2.0 tools, including a special section for legal.

If you’re really keen, you can even track their new case studies and use cases as they add them to delicious.

Social communities in Sharepoint

posted June 11th, 2008 by Neil Richards

I came across an interesting post from Microsoft Sharepoint Team Blog today which provides a good example of the power of Sharepoint. The details aren’t very interesting for KM folks, but the outcome is.

NewsGator recently announced their Social Sites product for Sharepoint 2007, which looks to provide an elegant mix of Facebook and Google Reader functionality for the enterprise. It’s well worth a look as the need for RSS is fairly clear, and the Facebook functionality might be used to support communities of practice within your firm.

Watch their video to get a better handle on what they offer (it’s pretty short).

Change? Yuck!

posted May 30th, 2008 by Neil Richards

I like to think of myself as being an advocate for change, able to move flexibly, and to adapt to new situatations (especially where technology is involved).

For the most part that’s true.

But today, I came across an example of why change is so difficult for people:

Now, that little picture is not very helpful without any context.

So, a story in three sentences.

While working today, I noticed that something felt wrong, but couldn’t place it. After an hour, I noticed that the Google favicon had changed in Firefox. I knew it didn’t matter, but I really didn’t like it (as I write this it is irritating me, possibly even taunting me).

It used to be , and changing to shouldn’t make a difference, but it’s annoying me.

Why? It’s different, nothing more, nothing less.

Who integrates what into Sharepoint

posted May 23rd, 2008 by Neil Richards

Just came across the very handy product compatibility matrix over on SharepointSearch.com. They also have “The BIG SharePoint Resource List” which you might take a look at.

Some useful excerpts.

CRM

InterAction (LexisNexis)

  • Handshake Software

Siebel (Oracle)

  • BA-Insight
  • Vorsite

Document Management

WorkSite

(Interwoven)

  • XMLAW
  • SHAREPOINTWorks
  • Interwoven

Documentum

(EMC Software Solutions)

  • Vorsite
  • EMC Software Solutions
  • Metalogix Software Corp
  • CASAHL Technology
  • KnowledgeLake
  • Tzunami Information Works
  • Wingspan Technology Inc

Collaboration

eRoom

(EMC Software Solutions)

  • EMC Software Solutions
  • Metalogix Software Corp
  • Tzunami Information Works

Microsoft Exchange

(Microsoft)

  • SHAREPOINTWorks

Technical Sharepoint posts over at neilrichards.net

posted May 15th, 2008 by Neil Richards

In getting to grips with Sharepoint for law firms, writing the footer and a couple other things we have in the pipeline, we’ve run across a number of tricky Sharepoint problems, both at an interface and code level. These lessons are worth sharing, but not with KM folk.

So, I’m using neilrichards.net/blog as a repository for some of the lessons we’ve learned. It’s as much for me to keep my knowledge somewhere as to share with others, and there’s no reason to keep it hidden.

Hope it helps!

~Neil

KISS metrics for your intranet

posted May 9th, 2008 by Matthew Parsons

Its time to acknowledge that metrics matter both behind and in front of the firewall.

Keep It Simple Stupid is an expression almost as dear to me as the goal of Simple, Elegant, Intuitive, Fast - and when it comes to metrics about intranet usage we all should have a lot more simplicity in our lives.

Whilst no ecommerce site would leave home without a metrics and analysis suite, when it comes to many intranets around the world, usage metrics are simply nowhere to be found.

Of course there is server monitoring to make sure that the server is alive courtesy of our IT friends, but often little attention is paid to whether people actually use the content, and what content they actually use. In part this is because the major analytics packages are designed for ecommerce and internet sites where click analytics mean money, with the result being that the stats packages tend to be very powerful and designed for use by an analyst rather than by the content owner. There are some excellent web traffic analysis tools available, ranging from the free Google Analytics, to hosted approaches like Click Density, through to packages like Webtrends and Omniture. Whilst we are big fans of Gooogle Analytics and Click
Density for public websites, security and risk concerns about sending intranet usage traffic outside the firewall often tend to rule them out for intranet use.

In an intranet context, where the strategic goal is to have only that content which is organisationally valuable arranged in a way that is easily found, usage metrics are equally important. From a knowledge management perspective, we want to know how many times a given piece of content is visited, where people came from, what links were clicked on the page, and what sort of distribution of use we are achieving. Is the 4 clicks per day just one person who happens to be the content owner……

Now, in line with keeping it simple, metrics are not helpful if they are just telling us how many hits have been received. “This page has been accessed 54,000 times since 2 June 2007″. Yikes, is that a good number or a bad number? We need to do mental math to work out what that means.

Surely the computer can do the maths for us to tell us something more useful in a framework we can understand - perhaps 34 views per day, 170 views per week and 680 view per month?

When we have the data presented like that we can quickly consider what level of daily traffic we would expect for the content item, and then get a sense of whether we are seeing the right levels and take appropriate action. In some cases it may signal more education is required, or the content is too difficult to find - but at least it can start activity to address the situation and make the intranet more relevant.

But wait.

If we now have the click traffic by person (with privacy protected), that means we can easily also retrieve the top 20 sites visited by the current user - that might be useful as well to place on an intranet home page perhaps - personalised, updated most valued links? Keeping it simple?

Now the good news.

To help you capture and share metrics for your intranet we have created MPAStats, available either as a Sharepoint webpart or as an html snippet which can be inserted into intranet pages. It is designed as a footer which sits happily at the bottom of the page, tracking activity, and displaying aggregate and detail stats with an ajax enabled click of a “More” link at the bottom of the page. All of the click data is stored in a database, which means you can still have an analyst easily produce customised reports and analysis.

MPAStats in default mode

Stats sit as a footer at the bottom of each intranet page in an expanding panel. Click the More link and analysed details of how people got to the current page, and what they clicked are displayed for easy review.

MPStats in expanded mode

If you are considering remodelling your intranet or perhaps moving to Sharepoint, add MPAStats to your current site for a couple of weeks and then your discussions about your new intranet can be grounded in actual data rather than what people “think might be important”.

Starting at just USD3,000 you no longer need to continue to fly blind on usage of your intranet. Of course, if you want to arm an analyst with a fully functioned analytic engine in addition to providing in page feedback, then you might want to acquire a Webtrends or equivalent in addition to MPAStats. We’ve found that for intranets, data collected by the MPAStats is more than sufficient to support better strategic decision making on intranet content management.

Of course, there are other ways and tools one can use to retrieve usage stats from Sharepoint (CardioLog and Ontolica spring to mind).  These tools tend to be focused on Administrators and Analysts, and take a different approach to sharing the data, where we place a premium on simple, in-page numbers at an attractive price point. Where detailed stats are required, running the tools in parallel might make sense. The price, processor, storage and bandwidth requirements of our web part are very low by comparison to running even the most basic Sharepoint infrastructure and our approach can be used to analyse non-Sharepoint infrastructure as well.

From a Data Protection perspective (important for those with operations in Europe), giving content owners access to the raw data may actually make available an inappropriate level of person-specific details. Our approach obfuscates the details of individual users (displaying “Person A”, “Person B”, etc), while providing transparent access for everybody.

So, the thought for the day. Bring some reality and some management to your intranet life with MPAStats, visible at the bottom of every page, kept simple, and helping you progress to a more business focused intranet.

MPAStats Logo